Quick Links
-Search Website
-Have A Question?
-Wallace News
-About This Site

General
•Misinformation Alert!
•Wallace Bio & Accomplishments
•Wallace Chronology
•Frequently Asked Questions
•Wallace Quotes
•Wallace Archives
•Miscellaneous Facts
•Links

Bibliography / Texts
•Wallace Writings Bibliography
•Texts of Wallace Writings
•Texts of Wallace Interviews
•Wallace Writings: Names Index
•Wallace Writings: Subject Index
•Writings on Wallace
•Wallace Obituaries
•Wallace's Most Cited Works

Features
•Taxonomic / Systematic Works
•Wallace on Conservation
•Smith on Wallace
•Research Threads
•Wallace Images
•Just for Fun
•Frequently Cited Colleagues
•Wallace-Related Maps & Figures

Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell Wallace (sic)

 
 
The Word "Scientist" (S507a: 1894/1895)

 
Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: Wallace's short response to an opinion survey as to whether the word "scientist" seemed objectionable. Printed (along with the responses of several others) on page 242 of Volume 1 (n.s.) of Science-Gossip in late 1894 or early 1895. To link directly to this page, connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S507A.htm


Parkstone, Dorset;
December 8th, 1894.

     Dear Sir,--I thought the very useful American term "Scientist" was now adopted, and I see Dr. Armstrong used it at the Chemical Society, yesterday. As we have Biologist, Zoologist, Geologist, Botanist, Chemist, Physicist, Physiologist and Specialist, why should we not use "Scientist"? And what have we to use instead? It seems to me that it has, as the Americans say, "come to stay," and it is too late in the day to object to it.

Yours very truly,
Alfred R. Wallace.


*                 *                 *                 *                 *

Return to Home