Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell Wallace (sic)
Discussion of a Paper on Ethnography by T. H. Huxley
(S167: 1870)
Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: Third party rendering of words Wallace offered in discussion of
the paper 'On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind,' read by T.
H. Huxley at the Ethnological Society of London meeting of 7 June 1870, and later printed in the
Society's Journal series. Original pagination indicated within double brackets. To link directly
to this page, connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S167.htm
[[p. 411]] Mr. Alfred R. Wallace said that, as a small contribution to the subject, he would
venture to point out that there were certain mental characteristics which in two at least of the
primary groups were as well marked and as constant as the physical characters by which
Professor Huxley had defined them. The great Mongoloid group, for instance, was distinguished
by a general gravity of demeanour and concealment of the emotions, by deliberation of speech,
and the absence of violent gesticulation, by the rarity of laughter, and by plaintive and
melancholy songs. The tribes composing it were pre-eminently apathetic and reserved; and this
character was exhibited to a high degree in the North-American Indian, and in all the Malay
races, and to a somewhat less extent over the whole of the enormous area occupied by the
Mongoloid type. Strongly contrasted with these were the Negroid group, whose characteristics
were vivacity and excitability, strong exhibitions of feeling, loud and rapid speech, boisterous
laughter, violent gesticulations, and rude, noisy music. They were preeminently impetuous and
demonstrative; and this feature was seen fully developed both in the African Negro and in the
widely removed Papuan of New Guinea. This striking correspondence of mental with physical
characters strongly supported the view that these two at least were among the best-marked
primary divisions of our race.
The only point on which he ventured to differ from the classification of Professor Huxley
was as to the position to be assigned to the brown Polynesians. These, as typically represented by
the Tahitians, [[p. 412]] appeared to him to be much more nearly related to the Papuans than to
the Malays, and should therefore be classed as Negroid instead of Mongoloid. In all important
physical characters, except colour, they agreed with the former; and the general testimony of
travellers, from Cook downwards, showed that their mental characteristics were entirely Negroid,
as evinced by their vivacity, demonstrativeness, and laughter. At the same time there was no
doubt a large infusion of Malay blood; but that this was for the most part a comparatively recent
event was shown by the language, which retained a number of Malay terms almost unchanged.
He maintained therefore that the typical Polynesians were fundamentally Negroid with a
considerable Mongoloid intermixture, and not originally Mongoloid with a Negroid intermixture.
*
*
*
*
*
Return to Home
|