Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell
Wallace (sic)
Anthropology
(S119: 1866)
Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: This is the
text of a short but instructive address Wallace gave on 23 August 1866
as President of the Department of Anthropology, Section D, Biology,
of the British Association for the Advancement of Science annual meetings.
It was later printed in Volume 36 of the Association's Report
series. Original pagination indicated within double brackets. To link
directly to this page, connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S119.htm
[[p. 93]] Anthropology
is the science which contemplates man under all his varied aspects (as
an animal, and as a moral and intellectual being) in his relations to
lower organisms, to his fellow men, and to the universe. The anthropologist
seeks to collect together and systematize the facts and the laws which
have been brought to light by all those branches of study which, directly
or indirectly, have man for their object. These are very various. The
physiologist, for example, studies man as a wondrous and most complicated
machine, whose parts and motions, actions and reactions he seeks thoroughly
to understand. The comparative anatomist and the zoologist compare his
structure with that of other animals, take note of their likenesses
and differences, determine their degrees of affinity, and seek after
the common plan of their organization and the law of their development.
The psychologist studies the mind of man, its mode of action, and its
development, compares it with the instincts and the reasoning faculties
of the lower animals, and ever aims at the solution of the greatest
of problems--whence and what is mind. The historian collects and arranges
the facts of man's progress in recent times; the geographer determines
the localities of the various races that now inhabit the earth, their
manners, customs, and physical characteristics; the archæologist
seeks, by studying the remains of man and his works, to supplement written
history and to carry back our knowledge of man's physical, mental, and
moral condition into prehistoric times; the geologist extends this kind
of knowledge to a still earlier epoch, by proving that man coexisted
with numerous animals now extinct, and inhabited Europe at so remote
a period that the very contour of its surface, the form of its hills
and valleys, no less than its climate, vegetation, and geology, were
materially different from what they now are, or ever have been during
the epoch of authentic history; the philologist devotes himself to the
study of human speech, and through it seeks to trace out the chief migrations
of nations, and the common origin of many of the races of mankind; and,
lastly, the phrenologist and the craniologist have created special sciences
out of the study of the human brain and skull. Considering the brain
as the organ of the mind, the phrenologist seeks to discover in what
way they correspond to each other, and to connect mental peculiarities
with the form and dimensions of the brain as indicated by the corresponding
form of its bony covering. The craniologist, confining his attention
to the skull as an indication of race, endeavours to trace out the affinities
of modern and ancient races of men, by the forms and dimensions of their
crania. These various studies have hitherto been pursued separately.
There has been great division of labour, but no combination of results.
Now it is our object as anthropologists to accept the well-ascertained
conclusions which have been arrived at by the students of all these
various sciences, to search after every new fact which may throw additional
light upon any of them, and, as far as we are able, to combine and generalize
the whole of the information thus obtained. We cannot, therefore, afford
to neglect any facts relating to man, however trivial, unmeaning, or
distasteful some of them may appear to us. Each custom, superstition,
or belief of savage or of civilized man may guide us towards an explanation
of their origin in common tendencies of the human mind. Each peculiarity
of form, colour, or constitution may give us a clue to the affinities
of an obscure race. The anthropologist must ever bear in mind that,
as the object of his study is man, nothing pertaining to or
[[p. 94]] characteristic of man can be unworthy
of his attention. It will be only after we have brought together and
arranged all the facts and principles which have been established by
the various special studies to which I have alluded, that we shall be
in a condition to determine the particular lines of investigation most
needed to complete our knowledge of man, and may hope ultimately to
arrive at some definite conclusions on the great problems which must
interest us all--the questions of the origin, the nature, and the destiny
of the human race. I would beg you to recollect also that here
we must treat all these problems as purely questions of science, to
be decided solely by facts and by legitimate deductions from facts.
We can accept no conclusions as authoritative that have not been thus
established. Our sole object is to find out for ourselves what is our
true nature, to feel our way cautiously, step by step, into the dark
and mysterious past of human history, to study man under every phase
and aspect of his present condition, and from the knowledge thus gained
to derive (as we cannot fail to do) some assistance in our attempts
to govern and improve uncivilized tribes, some guidance in our own national
and individual progress.
*
*
*
*
*
Return to Home
|