Quick Links
-Search Website
-Have A Question?
-Wallace News
-About This Site

Misinformation Alert!
Wallace Bio & Accomplishments
Wallace Chronology
Frequently Asked Questions
Wallace Quotes
Wallace Archives
Miscellaneous Facts

Bibliography / Texts
Wallace Writings Bibliography
Texts of Wallace Writings
Texts of Wallace Interviews
Wallace Writings: Names Index
Wallace Writings: Subject Index
Writings on Wallace
Wallace Obituaries
Wallace's Most Cited Works

Taxonomic / Systematic Works
Wallace on Conservation
Smith on Wallace
Research Threads
Wallace Images
Just for Fun
Frequently Cited Colleagues
Wallace-Related Maps & Figures

Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell Wallace (sic)

Land Nationalisation Society Meeting Letter
(S703: 1913)

Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: A letter to Joseph Hyder read at the thirty-second annual meeting of the Land Nationalisation Society on 28 May 1913. Later printed on page 88 of the June 1913 issue of The Land Nationaliser. To link directly to this page, connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S703.htm

Old Orchard,
Broadstone, Dorset.
May 25th, 1913.

Dear Mr. Hyder,

     Now that "Land Reform" is promised us I think it is time to urge our members to use effort to have two great injustices amended, which were advocated by many advanced Liberals before our Society was formed, but which are now almost forgotten. One is the Law of Inheritance of Land, as distinct from other forms of property; the other, the absorption of all improvements made by the tenant at the termination of "building leases." A case of the first kind has just come to my personal knowledge, of a mechanic whose whole property was a leasehold house and its furniture. He died intestate leaving a son and daughter by his first wife, and his widow, who was his second wife. The furniture is equally divided, but the house and garden, of much greater value, goes to the son only leaving the widow a pauper.

     The usual building lease is in every way unjust and contrary to public policy. It could be best amended by giving the tenant a legal right to buy the reversion in the early years of the lease, at its fair official valuation; while in the other case the law of inheritance of real and personal property should be made the same.

     Whenever the "Land" question comes up in the House of Commons Mr. Lloyd George should be asked if he is going to deal with these two recognised abuses of Landlordism, and if he is vague on the points, a discussion should be forced whenever possible. He should know that there is a very strong feeling upon them, and has been this thirty or forty years.

Yours truly,
Alfred R. Wallace.

*                 *                 *                 *                 *

Return to Home