Quick Links
-Search Website
-Have A Question?
-Wallace News
-About This Site

Misinformation Alert!
Wallace Bio & Accomplishments
Wallace Chronology
Frequently Asked Questions
Wallace Quotes
Wallace Archives
Miscellaneous Facts

Bibliography / Texts
Wallace Writings Bibliography
Texts of Wallace Writings
Texts of Wallace Interviews
Wallace Writings: Names Index
Wallace Writings: Subject Index
Writings on Wallace
Wallace Obituaries
Wallace's Most Cited Works

Taxonomic / Systematic Works
Wallace on Conservation
Smith on Wallace
Research Threads
Wallace Images
Just for Fun
Frequently Cited Colleagues
Wallace-Related Maps & Figures

Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell Wallace (sic)

The Antiquity of Man (S248c: 1875)

Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: Part of a letter from Wallace read at the 20 April 1875 meeting of the Adelaide Philosophical Society in Australia; later reported under this title as part of the article "Adelaide Philosophical Society" on pages 5 and 6 of the 21 April 1875 issue of the South Australian Register, with the portion on Wallace appearing on page 5. To link directly to this page connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S248C.htm

    Mr. C. A. Wilson said he had received a letter from his cousin, Mr. A. R. Wallace, concerning a question which he asked him about the fossil man of Mentone, in the South of France. Mr. Wallace said:--"The fossil man of Mentone to which you refer did not, I believe, add much to our knowledge of the antiquity of man. It was probably not older than other remains found in the caves of the South of France, and it appears to have been taken away without sufficient care having been taken to ascertain its exact position and all the minute details of its surroundings, which might have enabled some better opinion of its age to be formed. As a perfect skeleton of a pre-historic man it is interesting, but not as being of any remarkable proved antiquity. I do not know if any special work has been published on it. I do not consider it nearly so interesting or instructive as the annual reports on the exploration of Kent's cavern, given in the Transactions of the British Association, and generally also in full in 'Nature.'"

*                 *                 *                 *                 *

Return to Home