Quick Links
-Search Website
-Have A Question?
-Wallace News
-About This Site

Misinformation Alert!
Wallace Bio & Accomplishments
Wallace Chronology
Frequently Asked Questions
Wallace Quotes
Wallace Archives
Miscellaneous Facts

Bibliography / Texts
Wallace Writings Bibliography
Texts of Wallace Writings
Texts of Wallace Interviews
Wallace Writings: Names Index
Wallace Writings: Subject Index
Writings on Wallace
Wallace Obituaries
Wallace's Most Cited Works

Taxonomic / Systematic Works
Wallace on Conservation
Smith on Wallace
Research Threads
Wallace Images
Just for Fun
Frequently Cited Colleagues
Wallace-Related Maps & Figures

Alfred Russel Wallace : Alfred Wallace : A. R. Wallace :
Russel Wallace : Alfred Russell Wallace (sic)

The Measurement of Geological Time
(S159: 1870)

Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: Printed in the 17 February and 3 March 1870 numbers of the journal Nature. Original paginations indicated within double brackets. To link directly to this page, connect with: http://people.wku.edu/charles.smith/wallace/S159.htm

[[p. 399]] I.

    Modern geological research has rendered it almost certain, that the same causes which produced the various formations with their imbedded fossils, have continued to act down to the present day. It has therefore become possible that, by means of changes which are known to have occurred in a given number of years, some measurement of the time represented by the whole series of geological formations might be obtained. It is true, that changes in the earth's surface, the records of which constitute the materials for geological research, occur very slowly, yet not so slowly as to be quite imperceptible in historical time. Land has risen or sunk beneath the sea, rivers have deepened their channels and have brought down sediment which has converted water into land, cliffs have been eaten away and the surface of the earth has been, in many ways, perceptibly and measurably altered during an ascertained number of centuries. But it is found that these changes are too minute, too limited and too uncertain, to afford the basis of even an approximate measurement of the time required for those grand mutations of sea and land, those contortions of rocky strata many thousands of feet thick, those upheavals of mountain-chains and that elaborate modelling of the surface into countless hills and valleys, with long inland escarpments and deep rock-bound gorges, which form the most prominent and most universal characteristics of the earth's superficial structure. Another deficiency in this mode of measurement arises from the fact, now universally admitted, that the record of past changes is excessively imperfect, so that even if we could estimate with tolerable accuracy the time required to deposit and upheave the series of strata of which we have any knowledge; still that estimate would only represent an unknown proportion, perhaps a minute fraction of the whole time which has elapsed since the strata began to be formed.

    But there is another class of geological phenomena which enable us to measure those very gaps in the record of which we have just spoken, and it is now generally admitted that the continual change of the forms of animal and vegetable life which each succeeding formation presents to us, affords the best means of estimating the proportionate length of geological epochs. Though we have no reason to think that this change was at all times effected by a uniform and regular process; yet believing, as we now do, that it was due to the action of a vast number and variety of natural causes acting and reacting on each other, according to fixed general laws, it seems probable that, with much local and temporary irregularity, there has been on the whole a considerable degree of uniformity in the rate at which organic forms have become modified. It may indeed be the case that this rate of variation has continually increased or diminished from the first appearance of life upon the earth until the present day, or has been subject to temporary changes; but so long as we have no proof that such was the case, we shall be safer in considering that the change has been tolerably uniform.

    To measure geological time, therefore, all we require is a trustworthy unit of measurement for the change of species: but this is exactly what we have not yet been able to get; for the whole length of the historical period has not produced the slightest perceptible change in any living thing in a state of nature. Moreover, though, the much longer time that has elapsed since the Neolithic or Newer Stone age, has been sufficient for some changes of physical geography and has, to some extent, altered the distribution of animals and plants, it has not effected any alteration in their form. It is only when we get back to the Palæolithic or Older Stone age, when men used chipped flints for weapons and Europe was, probably, either just emerging from the severity of the glacial epoch, or in some of the intercalated milder periods, that we meet with a decided change in the forms of life. Elephants and rhinoceroses, bears, lions and hyenas then inhabited Europe; but they were nearly all of species slightly different from any now existing, while the reindeer, the musk-sheep, the lemming and some other animals, were the same as those that still live in the Arctic regions: all the mollusca, however, were identical with living species. In the newer Pliocene Crag, on the other hand, which seems to have been deposited just as the glacial epoch was coming on, there are 11 per cent. of extinct species of shells and about 55 per cent. of extinct mammalia. What we want, therefore, is to be able to estimate, by means of the physical changes before alluded to, the time since the beginning or the end of the glacial epoch. Then we should have the unit we require for measuring geological time by the repeated changes in the forms of life as we go further and further back into the past; but before showing how this may perhaps be done, something must be said about physical and astronomical determinations of the age of our globe.

    A few years ago, Sir W. Thomson startled geologists by placing a limit to the time at their disposal, which they had been in the habit of regarding as practically infinite. He showed, from the known laws of heat and the conservation of energy, that there are determinable limits to the age of the sun. Then, applying the same principles to the earth, he showed that, from the known increase of heat towards its interior and from experiments on the rate of cooling of various rocks, it cannot have existed in habitable state for more than about one hundred million years. It is within that time, therefore, that the whole series of geological changes, the origin and development of all forms of life, must be comprised. But, geologists had been accustomed to demand a much vaster period than this for the production of the series of fossiliferous deposits in the crust of the earth; while the researches of Mr. Darwin render it almost certain that, however vast the time since the Silurian and Cambrian epochs, yet anterior to these, at least an equal, and probably a much longer, series of ages must have elapsed since life first appeared upon the earth, in order to allow for the slow development of the varied and highly organised forms which we find in existence at those early epochs. Sir Charles Lyell is not disposed to admit the accuracy of these calculations, and Professor Huxley has criticised them in detail, with a view of showing that they are, in many respects, unsound; while Mr. Croll as strenuously maintains that they are sound in principle and accurate within certain limits.

    We have now to consider the bearing of Astronomy upon the problem. In a series of admirable papers in the Philosophical Magazine, Mr. Croll has fully discussed [[p. 400]] the question, how far variations in the excentricity of the earth's orbit, together with the precession of the equinoxes, have produced variations of climate in past ages. He has endeavoured to show that the date of the last glacial epoch and those preceding, may be determined by such considerations. With this view he has laboriously calculated tables showing the amount of excentricity for a period of three million years, at intervals of 10,000 years for a large portion of that time, and 50,000 for the remainder. These tables show that the amount of excentricity is alternately great and small at intervals of 50,000 or 100,000 years, as represented with sufficient accuracy in the diagram, which I have constructed by means of his figures. Owing to the precession of the equinoxes, combined with the revolution of the apsides, either pole will be presented towards the sun (constituting summer in that hemisphere and winter in the opposite one) at a different point in the earth's orbit on each succeeding year, the motion being such as to cause a complete revolution in 21,000 years. If, therefore, at any one period, winter in the northern hemisphere occurs when the earth is nearest the sun or in perihelion (as is the case now), in 10,500 years it will occur in aphelion; at the one period the winters will be shorter and warmer, at the other longer and colder. When the excentricity is great (say two, three, or four times what it is now), Mr. Croll shows that, from the known laws of heat in reference to air and water, winter in aphelion will lead to an accumulation of snow, in the polar regions, which the summer will not be able to melt. This will go on increasing for many thousand years, till winter occurs near the perihelion, when the snow will be melted and transferred to the opposite pole. When the excentricity was very great a glacial epoch would occur in each hemisphere for more or less than 10,500 years, the other portion of the period of 21,000 years being occupied by an almost perpetual spring, with two transition periods from that to the glacial epoch. By examining the diagram of excentricity, we see that during the last three million years there have been more than twelve periods of great excentricity, each long enough to admit two or three, and several of them eight or ten, complete revolutions of the equinoctial points, thus sufficing for the production of not less than fifty or sixty glacial epochs in each hemisphere, with intervening phases of perpetual spring or summer.

      The diagram also shows us (and this is of very great importance) that the present amount of excentricity is exceptionally small. During the last three million years there have only been five occasions, always of very short duration, when it has been less than it is now, while periods of high excentricity have often lasted for two hundred thousand years at a time. This period of three million years probably includes a large portion of the tertiary period, which therefore should have mainly consisted of alternations of warm and cold climates in each hemisphere, the latter generally forming true glacial epochs. This seems the legitimate deduction from Mr. Croll's reasoning and from the tables of excentricity with which he has furnished us; but, as he very justly argues, we cannot expect to find geological evidence of all these changes of climate. The warm and temperate periods will naturally leave the best records, while the cold epochs will generally be characterised only by an absence of organic remains. Besides, we must consider 10,500 years as a very small fragment of time in geology and we have good reason for thinking that several such periods might pass away without the occurrence of those exceptional conditions which Mr. Darwin and Sir C. Lyell have shown to be necessary for the preservation of any geological record. As to physical proofs of ice-action, very few could survive the repeated denudations, upheavals and subsidences, which the surface must have undergone since any of the earlier glacial epochs; so that it may be fairly argued that these repeated changes of climate may have occurred and yet have left no distinct record by which the geologist could interpret their history.

    Throughout the whole of his argument, Mr. Croll considers astronomical causes to be the most important and effective agents in modifying climate, while Sir Charles Lyell maintains that the distribution of land and water, with their action on each other by influencing marine and aerial currents, are of prepondering importance. He has certainly shown that these causes have an immense influence at the present time. The effects which, on Mr. Croll's theory, ought to be produced by the existing phase of precession combined with even the small amount of excentricity that now exists, is not only neutralised, but actually reversed by terrestrial causes. Dove has shown that the whole earth is really warmer when it is furthest from the sun in June, than when it is nearest in December, a fact which is to be explained by the northern hemisphere (turned toward the sun in June) having so much more land than the southern. So, the northern hemisphere being three millions of miles nearer the sun in winter than in summer, while the southern hemisphere is the reverse, the northern winter ought to be warmer and the northern summer cooler than the southern; but this, too, is the opposite of the fact, for the southern summer is more than 11° Fahr. cooler than ours, while its winter is nearly 5° Fahr. warmer. The immense differences of temperature of places in the same latitude, sometimes amounting to nearly 30° Fahr., can also be traced, in almost every instance, to the distribution of land and water and of winds and currents. Sir Charles Lyell further [[p. 401]] argues that the existing distribution of land is so extremely irregular--such an undue proportion being near the poles, while there is such a deficiency at the equator and in the south temperate zone--that whatever differences may have occurred in past time, they can hardly fail to have often been such as to cause a more uniform climate. Therefore he believes that if the poles were tolerably free from land, so as to admit of the uninterrupted circulation of the warmer equatorial waters and to afford no lodgment for great accumulations of snow and ice, a glacial epoch would be impossible even during the most extreme phases of excentricity.

    We have now much evidence to show that three distinct modifications in physical geography occurred just before or during the Glacial epoch, which would each tend to lower the temperature. The first is the submergence of the Sahara, which would have caused the southerly winds to be charged with aqueous vapour, condensing on the Alps into snow instead of being, as now, dry and heated and acting powerfully to melt the glaciers. The second is the submergence of Lapland, which would have admitted the cold iceberg-laden waters of the Arctic Sea into the very heart of Europe. The third is the probable submergence of part of Central America, causing the Gulf Stream to be diverted into the Pacific. The only proof of this is the fact that one-third of the known species of marine fishes are absolutely identical on the two sides of the isthmus of Panama; but it is impossible to conceive any means by which such an amount of identity could have been brought about except by a recent, if only a temporary, communication. A subsidence and elevation no greater than what occurred in Wales about the same time--as proved by Arctic shells of existing species in drift 1,300 feet above the sea--would have effected the communication by a broad and deep channel. Now if any two of these changes of physical geography occurred together, we may be sure that a very small increase of excentricity would have led to a more severe glacial epoch than would be possible, under existing conditions, with a much larger excentricity. We must keep this in mind when attempting to fix the most probable date for the last glacial epoch.

[[p. 452]] II.

    We have now to consider an entirely distinct set of facts which have an important bearing on the probable time elapsed since the last glacial epoch. Messrs. A. Tylor, Croll, and Geikie have shown that the amount of denudation now taking place is much greater than has generally been supposed. The quantity of water discharged by several rivers and the quantity of sediment carried down by those rivers have been measured with tolerable accuracy, and allowing for the difference of specific gravity between sediment and rock, it can be easily calculated, from the known area of each river basin, what average thickness has been removed from its whole surface in a year, since all the matter brought down by the river must evidently have come from some part of its basin. In this way it is found that the Mississippi has its basin lowered 1/6000 of a foot per annum; the Ganges, 1/2358; the Rhone, 1/1526; the Hoang-Ho, 1/1464; the Po, 1/729.

    But it is evident that this amount will be distributed very unequally over different parts of the basin, according as the surface is flat or sloping, whether the slopes are of loose soil or of rock, whether the rock is solid or friable. The perfectly flat alluvial plains that form a considerable part of many river basins, will not only suffer no denudation, but will generally receive deposits of sediment during floods, and all such flat lands should therefore be deducted from the area of the river. Slightly undulating lands, especially if well covered with forest, will also suffer scarcely any denudation, as is well seen in the case of the Rio Negro branch of the Amazon and other black water rivers of South America, which hardly carry down any perceptible sediment even when in full flood. Again, wherever lakes occur, they receive all the sediment from the basin above them, which portion should therefore be treated by itself, since it contributes no sediment to the main river. If we look at a physical map of North America we see that a large extent of the Mississippi basin consists of alluvial flats and slightly undulating prairie, sufficiently explaining its small proportionate denudation. Even the Rhone, which has a high rate of denudation, flows through a great extent of low lands and perfectly flat meadows, while the upper portion of its valley which produces most sediment is cut off by the Lake of Geneva. In order, therefore, to arrive at any fair estimate of the amount of denudation in the upland and mountainous portions of the Rhone valley (which is what we require for our purpose) we have considerably to reduce the area of its basin by taking away the flat lands in all its valleys, and considerably to increase the amount of sediment by adding all that is now poured into the Lake of Geneva. We shall probably not be far wrong in adding one third to its denuding powers on these grounds, which will lead us to the startling fact that the Rhone basin is being lowered at the rate of a foot in a thousand years; but even this is considerably less than in the case of the Po. Mr. Croll takes the Mississippi denudation of a foot in six thousand years as a measure for that of Europe; but for reasons above stated I conceive this to be quite out of the question, and I maintain, that if we are to use his measure of denudation for any practical purpose, we must apply that of European rivers to European phenomena, that of Alpine rivers to Alpine phenomena, and must further make the necessary corrections for alluvial flats and intercepting lakes.

    Mr. Croll and Sir Charles Lyell were at first both inclined to adopt the period of high excentricity which occurred from 750,000 to 950,000 years ago as that of the glacial epoch, but Mr. Croll, in consideration of the proofs of rapid denudation above given, now believes that the [[p. 453]] period beginning about 240,000 and ending about 80,000 years ago, is the more likely one. Even this, however, offers difficulties. Denudation in Wales and Scotland must probably have gone on as rapidly as the average rate of the Rhone valley, especially during the period when the old glaciers were disappearing; and eighty thousand years will therefore imply eighty feet of average denudation over the whole surface of the country, if less in one part then correspondingly more in another; but how is this consistent with the preservation of ice-ground rock-surfaces and glacial furrows in so many situations, as well as numberless heaps of loose matter, the moraines of ancient glaciers, apparently just as they were left by the ice? There are, it is true, a few considerations that go to diminish though not to remove the difficulty. The amount of denudation is now abnormally large, because the large quantities of glacial drift left over the surface of the country, supply much of the sediment carried down by the streams of Alpine countries. Many glacial markings were at first covered up and preserved by drift or alluvium, and have been since exposed by denudation: those earliest exposed are obliterated, but new surfaces are being continually uncovered. The amount of denudation of a solid rock-surface may not be a tenth part of that which now obtains in glaciated districts; a fact which can only be ascertained by determining the amount of sediment brought down by streams the basins of which are free from drift or gravel, and consist almost wholly of compact rock surfaces. We still have to deal with the difficulty of the moraines, whose form and aspect are often so fresh that we can hardly believe them to have been much changed since the ice left them, although it is impossible to understand how they have escaped the denudation which has lowered the whole surface of the country eighty, or even a much smaller number of feet.

    It is true Mr. Geikie, in his paper on Modern Denudation,1 suggests that all the effects of ice-action, now visible, are merely the few examples which have been preserved owing to a concurrence of favourable conditions, while a much larger number have been destroyed; and I learn from him that there are in Scotland moraines in all stages of decay. If this be the true explanation of the difficulty, it follows that denudation must be extremely unequal, and that if one valley or hill-side has remained unaltered during 80,000 years, another must have been denuded to double the average amount.

    Having thus shown the difficulty there is in accepting even the shorter period of 80,000 years for the date of the end of the glacial epoch in Europe, let us see what other modes of measurement are available. In Sir Charles Lyell's "Antiquity of Man," 2nd ed., p. 28, we have three different calculations of the age of the bronze and stone periods in Switzerland, which would place the latter at about from 5,000 to 7,000 years ago. At page 321 of the same work, we have an estimate of the age of the upper delta of the Tinière by M. Morlot. The lower delta (by the presence of Roman remains in one of the upper strata) is calculated with tolerable certainty to be 10,000 years old, while the upper delta, 150 feet above the lake, is ten times as large as the lower one, and is therefore supposed to be 100,000 years old. From its fossil remains it is believed to be post-glacial; but it is evident that, during the melting of the ice, the torrent might have been more powerful, and have accumulated a delta much more rapidly than now. The peat mosses of Denmark, indicating that the present beech-tree vegetation of that country, which was also characteristic of it in the Roman period, was in the Bronze age replaced by oaks, and in the still earlier Stone age by fir-trees, imply a very long lapse of time; yet this only takes us back to the Neolithic age, when all the shells and all the mammalia were of existing species. The 8,000 or 10,000 years of the Swiss Stone age may, however, have sufficed for this change. There seems to be no doubt, that the time which elapsed from the close of the glacial epoch (when man used the rudest flint weapons, and was coeval with many extinct animals, when, moreover, the climate and physical features of the country were considerably different from what they are now) up to the Neolithic age, was much greater than from the latter date to the present day, but how much greater it is impossible to determine. The position of many of the tool-bearing gravels shows that rivers then flowed at much higher levels, but from the known rate of denudation, a valley might be deepened even 50 or 100 feet in as little as 50,000 years, since it is in valleys that the effects of denudation would be greatest; and the extinction of the various animals might certainly take place in an equal time under such conditions as are not unlikely to have occurred at a period of great climatic change.

    It does not appear, therefore, that any of the estimates of time founded on an actual basis of observed change in a known period, require us to assume more than 80,000 years since the close of the glacial epoch, while the measurement of the existing rate of denudation renders it almost certain that it was less rather than more. We may fairly assume, that even if a large excentricity has been an essential condition of a glacial epoch, the ice would maintain itself into a period of less excentricity than would be required to bring one on. Now 74,000 years ago the excentricity was about double what it is now, and the winter of the northern hemisphere then occurred in aphelion, so that the glacial epoch would at that time probably have been in full force, and we may assume that it might continue 3,000 or 4,000 years longer. But when we come to 65,000 years back, we find the excentricity scarcely more than it is at present, and winter nearly in perihelion; so that we must conclude, if excentricity has anything to do with it, that the last glacial period came to an end not less than 70,000 years ago.

    Now it is most important to observe that, for the last 60,000 years, the excentricity has been very small--for three-fourths of the time less than it is now. During this time the opposite phases of precession, each lasting 10,500 years, will have produced scarcely any effect on climate, which in every part of the earth will have been nearly uniform for that long period. But this is quite an exceptional state of things; for the curve of excentricity shows us that, during almost the whole of the last three million years, the excentricity has been high--almost always twice, and sometimes three and four times as much as it is now. If, therefore, Mr. Croll's theory be correct, there will have been a change each 10,500 years during this vast period (in all the extra-tropical regions at least) from a very cold to a very mild [[p. 454]] climate. This will necessarily have caused much migration both of plants and animals, which would inevitably result in much extinction and comparatively rapid modification. Allied races would be continually brought into competition, altered physical conditions would induce variation, and thus we should have all the elements for natural selection and the struggle for life, to work upon and develop new races. High excentricity would therefore lead to a rapid change of species, low excentricity to a persistence of the same forms; and, as we are now, and have been for 60,000 years, in a period of low excentricity, the rate of change of species during that time may be no measure of the rate that has generally obtained in past geological epochs. Thus we should have explained the extraordinary persistence of organic forms during the historical period as well as during the preceding Neolithic age, although slight changes of climate and of physical geography have undoubtedly taken place; and it would prove to be not so much the usually slow rate of organic change, as the fact of our living in the midst of an exceptionally uniform climatic epoch, that has hitherto prevented us from obtaining a measure of the average duration of species.

    These considerations have an important bearing on our estimate of the duration of the glacial epoch itself, and on our calculation of geological time from the change of species since its commencement. If it terminated 70,000 years ago, and if each 10,500 years before that date, there was alternately a warm period and a glacial epoch, there would necessarily occur a series of northern and southern migrations of animals and plants, and thus deposits formed at times not geologically remote, might contain very distinct groups of animals. These might even meet and be confounded in the same strata, and thus lead to that extraordinary mixture of northern and southern forms which occurs in some of the more recent formations, like the hippopotamus and mammoth in the Norfolk crag and the lower brick-earths.

    Geologists seem hardly to have attached sufficient importance to the great gap that intervenes between the Palæolithic and Pre-historic ages. Mr. Boyd Dawkins has shown, from a careful study of their mammalian remains, that the whole of the post-glacial river deposits and cave-beds of this country (148 in number) are of the same age, being characterised by about twenty species of extinct or arctic mammalia, and this was the age of Palæolithic man. In the Pre-historic or Neolithic age all these have disappeared, while the sheep, goat, dog, and Bos longifrons are first met with. Now, on the theory that this Palæolithic age was entirely post-glacial, and that the climate and physical geography of Britain have been since slowly approaching their present condition, how is this great gap to be accounted for? The large number of places where remains have been found, shows that the conditions requisite for preserving them very frequently occurred, and there must therefore have been some special cause which has prevented any record being left of the long period during which they were becoming extinct. Mr. J. Scott Moore2 maintains that they were all pre-glacial, and that the gap was the glacial epoch itself. He adduces in corroboration the striking fact that none of the supposed post-glacial gravels ever rest on the boulder clay, but always on an older rock, which could hardly have been the case in every instance were they all post-glacial. Again, Mr. Boyd Dawkins tells us that the identity of such a large proportion of the species of pre-glacial and post-glacial mammals "forbids the idea of the existence of any gap or lacuna which would warrant the classification of the one as tertiary and the other as quaternary." But if we admit the occurrence, during the last glacial epoch, not only of one or two, but of a series of alternate cold and warm periods, we may make the Palæolithic age inter-glacial, and suppose it to have occupied several of these alternations of climate. If we further place the last submergence which separated Britain from the Continent, during one of the later phases of extreme cold, when most of the extinct mammalia, as well as man, had migrated southwards, we shall sufficiently account for the great gap that intervenes between the Palæolithic and Pre-historic ages.

    In the "Principles of Geology," 10th ed., vol. i, p. 300, Sir C. Lyell has given an estimate of the duration of geological epochs, from the proportionate change in the species of marine mollusca, taking as a basis a million years since the beginning of the glacial epoch. Of the marine shells then living, six per cent. have become extinct, while at the close of the glacial epoch they were all of existing species, but this does not necessarily imply that the former are many times older than the latter. The glacial period itself may have been the cause of their extinction independently of mere time; so that the Bridlington beds, where the above-mentioned proportion of extinct species occurs, need not on this account be more than twice as old as those glacial or post-glacial drifts which contain only living species, or, according to our previous estimate, about 140,000 years. The Norfolk crag, which contains eleven per cent. of extinct shells, may be from 40,000 to 60,000 years older; this will allow for two or three alternations of warm and cold periods, which, at a time of such high excentricity, must have been strongly contrasted, and have led to a correspondingly rapid change of species. From these considerations it becomes evident that the time, measured by the occurrence of five per cent. of extinct species of marine shells, is not necessarily the whole number of years which has elapsed since they existed, but only that number minus the last 60,000 years of uniform climate and specific immobility; and we may be even too lavish of time if we allow so much as 100,000 years for this amount of change under the influence of those repeated alternations of climate which have characterised the last three million years and which have probably more or less characterised all past geological time. If now we take this number as our datum instead of a million years, all Sir Charles Lyell's figures will be reduced to a tenth, and will stand thus: the time elapsed since the beginning of the--

Lower Miocene               2,000,000          years
Eocene                          6,000,000             "
Cretaceous                   10,000,000             "
Triassic                         14,000,000             "
Permian                        16,000,000             "
Carboniferous                18,000,000             "
Devonian                      20,000,000             "
Silurian                         22,000,000             "
Cambrian                      24,000,000             "
    These figures will seem very small to some geologists who have been accustomed to speak of "millions" as [[p. 455]] small matters; but I hope I have shown that, so far as we have any means at present of measuring geological time, they may be amply sufficient. Taking Sir William Thomson's allowance of a hundred million years for the time during which the earth can have been fit for life, it yet allows Mr. Darwin, for the process of development from the primordial germ, three times as many years anterior to the Cambrian epoch as have elapsed since that date, an amount of time which, I believe, will fully satisfy him, by whatever scale we may measure it.

    The evidence of the rapidity of denudation would indeed tend to the still further shortening of the estimate here given; and it is not impossible that a concurrence of geographical conditions might have brought down the glacial epoch into a period when the excentricity was no greater, or even less, than it is now. This, however, is hardly probable, and I am inclined to think that the considerations already alluded to will, to a considerable extent, explain how it is that so many signs of glacial action still remain, in spite of such denudation. The only argument I consider new in this paper, is that derived from the uniformity of climate during the last 60,000 years, and the alternations of heat and cold for a long time previously, leading to a slower change of species since the glacial epoch than at any former period, thus allowing us to suppose change of form in the organic world to go on more rapidly than we had before thought possible. If this be a sound deduction, it will, I believe, more than anything else, enable us to bring the period required for the development of the whole organic world within that which modern natural philosophy assigns as the age of the habitable earth.

    Much of the force of my argument appears to depend upon the accuracy of Mr. Croll's view, that, during a time of great excentricity, there will be in each hemisphere alternately a glacial epoch for about 10,500 years, and a perpetual spring or summer for about an equal period. But Sir Charles Lyell argues, with great force, for the opposite view, that the cold of one period would be continued through the other, and that during the whole continuance of a phase of high excentricity both hemispheres would be in a state of glaciation. Supposing this view to be the true one, it will not very materially affect my argument, for the diagram shows many comparatively rapid alternations from a very high to a very low excentricity, which would also be from a glacial to a temperate climate and would certainly tend to comparative rapidity of specific change; while in each 10,500 years there would, no doubt, be some retreat and advance of the snow line, followed by a less amount of migration, competition, and variation. During the last 60,000 years, on the other hand, the change of excentricity has been hardly perceptible, and the change of organic forms may be supposed to have been far below the average.

Notes Appearing in the Original Work

1Transactions of the Geological Society of Glasgow, vol. iii. p. 153. [[on p. 453]]
2Pre-glacial Man and Geological Chronology. Dublin, 1868. [[on p. 454]]

*                 *                 *                 *                 *

Return to Home