INTRODUCTION
First, recall the goals of the archaeological excavations at Hilltopper Shelter. One research question concerns when the site was occupied. Is Hilltopper Shelter a single component historic period site or a multicomponent site that also represents prehistoric occupations? Can a specific range of years be specified for each occupation? The other research question relates to the function of the site during each temporally-distinct occupation. How was the site used during each occupation?
In the previous labs we considered how lithic,
ceramic/pottery,
and floral artifacts might be used to answer these questions. In
this lab, we examine how faunal remains can be used to address these
questions.
Our zooarchaeological analysis will proceed with these questions in
mind.
How can animal remains be used to determine time and period of
occupation?
How can animal remains be used to determine site function? Faunal
identification and interpretation are demonstrated in this lab.
OCCUPATION HISTORY
None of the animal remains was submitted
for
radiocarbon dating. Therefore, you do not need to consider faunal
evidence related to the question of when the site was occupied.
You do not need to include a section on the periods of site occupation
for this lab report.
SITE FUNCTION
Faunal remains were recovered from various
features and stratigraphic zones at Hilltopper Shelter. Assuming
that all the animal remains are artifacts as opposed to ecofacts, the
faunal
remains may be used to determine the nature of animal use, the economic
importance of animal
species,
the season of site occupation, and the intensity of site occupation.
Nature of
animal use: Consider how animals
were used by the inhabitants, keeping in mind that animals have uses
other
than consumption / subsistence. Some animal parts were used for
tools,
clothing, ritual garb, and personal ornamentation. The following
table serves as an interpretive guideline.
ANIMAL USE | ANIMAL TYPES OR PARTS |
subsistence / consumption | deer, mussel, turkey, rabbit, raccoon, opossum, squirrel, snake, bear, pig, cow, sheep, goat |
clothing | deer, cow, pig |
companionship / hunting | dog, cat |
tools | large and durable animal bone, shell, antler, horn, teeth |
personal ornamentation | modified animal bone / shell / antler / horn / teeth, feathers, claws |
ceremony / ritual | feathers, skulls, claws, jaws |
Economic
importance of animals: Using some
method of quantification or quantitative analysis including calculation of minimum number of
individuals, determine what type
of economy is represented for each occupation and what animals were the
most important economically. The following table serves as an
interpretive
guideline.
COLLECTING | HERDING | |
HISTORIC | deer, turkey, rabbit, opossum, raccoon, squirrel, bear, mussel |
cow, pig, sheep, goat |
PREHISTORIC | deer, turkey, rabbit, opossum, raccoon, squirrel, bear, mussel |
none |
Season of occupation: Using some method of quantification or quantitative analysis, determine during what season(s) the site was occupied. Deer and turkey are usually taken in the fall. Mussels are often collected in the spring and summer. Small mammals are often used year-round.
Intensity of
site occupation: Using some
method
of quantification or quantitative analysis, compare animal assemblages
from different contexts to determine the intensity of site occupation.
Generally speaking, the volume or density of faunal materials are
indicative
of frequency and/or duration of site use. High densities of bone
suggest
frequent use of a site or long durations of site occupation. Diverse
animal
assemblages may indicate more intensive site use. Animal remains
from multiple seasons suggest longer duration of occupation than do
animal
remains from just one season.
ASSIGNMENT: Using
reference materials and comparative collections in the lab, identify
the
types of faunal remains from each field sample. Record the sample
number, provenience, species (if possible), bone element (if possible),
and alterations or modifications. Record any other attributes you
deem relevant to answering the research questions.
SITE REPORT
The results of the zooarchaeological analysis must be described in the site report. The zooarchaeological analysis section usually includes descriptive text, data tables, data figures, and quantitative analysis. I suggest paragraphs (with supporting figures and tables, as appropriate) describing the composition, distribution and preservation of the animal remains from the site. Follow this with paragraphs (plus supporting figures and tables) on the relationship between animals and site function during each occupation. What types of activities, based on faunal remains, occurred at the site? What were the most economically important animals used during each occupation, and do these indicate collecting or herding or both? What were the season(s) of occupation for each zone? How intensely was the site used during each occupation?
ASSIGNMENT:
Compose
the zooarchaeological analysis section of the final site report.
Follow the stylistic format of the existing portions of the site
report.
Click here for more details.