Rubric for Multimedia Project

Teacher name: Nathan L. Love

Student Name ___________________


CATEGORY

4

3

2

1

Conception & Objectives

The objectives are clearly stated, and well served by with the design of the project.

The objectives are evident, and are compatible with the design of the project.

The objectives are not readily apparent, or are loosely related to the design of the project.

The objectives are not evident, or the design does not support them well.

Effectiveness vis-à-vis #1

The project is highly effective.

The project is effective for the most part.

The effectiveness could be greatly improved.

The effectiveness is not at all evident.

Presentation & Attractiveness

Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation.

Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation.

Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content.

Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presenation content.

Organization, Navigation & Interactivity

Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. Excellent interactivity.

Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. Good interactivity.

Content is logically organized for the most part. Navigation could be improved. Little or trivial interactivity.

There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. Not enough interactivity of useful sort.

Sources and Support

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documentation supports thrust or thesis.

Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documentation supports thrust or thesis.

Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes. Most documentation does not support thrust or thesis.

Very little or no source information was collected.

Foreign Language pedagogy 

Apart from multimedia, significant FL learning to be gained. Target language used appropriately.

Target language used appropriately for the most part.

Too little use of target language.

Target language not used.

Culture of FL & Authenticity

Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent.

Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good.

Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.

Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors.

Technology Standards

Addressing specific technology standards well.

Touches on some technology standards well.

Addressing few techology standards, or does not support or comply with them well.

Offers little compliance with technology standards.

Originality and Credits

Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. Gives credit to work of others.

Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. Gives credit to work of others.

Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking.

Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit.



Date Modified: 2006-06-25 by N.L. Love


Copyright. © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 ALTec, the University of Kansas