INTRODUCTION
Because human origins and the course of human evolution were
contingent
upon previous events in non-human primate evolution, it is important
that
we understand the origins and development of non-human primates during
the Cenozoic Era. In order to understand and evaluate the fossil
record of non-human primate evolution, we must first understand the
morphological
differences among different types of primates. Therefore, this
lab
focuses on two main topics: primate comparative anatomy and
morphology and
fossil
evidence of non-human primate evolution.
OBJECTIVES
Upon successful completion of this lab, students will
READINGS
Complete the readings prior to class.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The following summary considers the physical characteristics of living primates, concepts that were covered in Anth 125, Introduction to Biological Anthropology. Primates is an order of mammals that are characterized by the following derived traits.
Sensory Traits
Locomotor Traits
Dental and Dietary Traits
Social-Reproductive Traits
Habitat
Other anatomical features have behavioral implications. For
example,
the degree of sexual dimorphism is an indication of
reproductive
behavior; monogamous species exhibit minimal sexual dimorphism while
polygamous
species exhibit extreme sexual dimorphism. Large, blade-like
incisors
usually indicate a frugivorous (fruit) diet while large molars
with
thick enamel indicate a folivorous (leaf) diet.
ASSIGNMENT
Answers to all questions will be neatly written in pencil on the answer sheets provided in lab. Exercises that do not require examination of skeletal specimens may be completedoutside of class time.
A. Complete the quadruped vs. biped comparative anatomy table on the answer sheet, based on the information provided in France's Chapter 4.
B. Based on the information in France's Chapter 4, study the four skeletal specimens (B1, B2, B3, B4) in the lab and identify each specimen as that of a quadruped or a biped.
C. Complete Exercise 5.1 in the France lab manual, recording your responses on the answer sheet. For question 3, give at least two differences. For question 4, give at least one difference. Skip the three indices calculations in question 9. Use the following figures to answer the questions:Question |
Figures |
1 |
4.12, 4.15 |
3 |
4.11, 4.114,
4.15 |
4 |
4.11, 4.15 |
5 |
4.9, 4.10,
4.13, 4.14 |
9 |
4.7, 4.8,
4.9, 4.14, 4.15 |
E. Based on the information covered in the required
readings,
study the four skeletal specimens (E1, E2, E3, E4) in the lab and
identify each specimen by type
of primate, as specifically as possible.
II. NON-HUMAN PRIMATE EVOLUTION
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
To provide temporal context, we must review those intervals of the
geologic
time scale related to primate origins and evolution. Geologists
divide
the history of the earth into two time intervals. The Crypotzoic
["hidden life"] Eon is the time period from the origins of the earth
about
4.5 billion years ago to the explosion of life forms on earth about
0.57
billion (570 million) years ago. The Phanerozoic ["visible life"]
Eon is the time period from 0.57 billion years ago to the present; it
is
divided into three eras. The Paleozoic ["ancient life"] Era is
dated
from 570 to 225 million years ago (mya) and saw the origins of new life
forms like insects, vertebrates, fishes, amphibians and reptiles.
The Mesozoic ["middle life"] Era is dated from 225 to 65 mya and saw
the
origins of mammals, birds and flowering plants. The Cenozoic
["recent
life"] Era is the time period from 65 mya to the present that saw the
adaptive
radiation of mammals and the origin of the mammalian order
Primates.
The Cenozoic Era is divided into seven epochs as
summarized
in the table below. In this lab we are concerned with primate
evolution
during the Paleocene, Eocene, Oligocene and Miocene epochs.
Epoch | Dates |
Paleocene | 66 to 58 mya |
Eocene | 58 to 37 mya |
Oligocene | 37 to 24 mya |
Miocene | 24 to 5 mya |
Pliocene | 5 to 1.6 mya |
Pleistocene | 1.6 mya to 10,000 ya |
Holocene | 10,000 ya to present |
In completing this lab assignment, remember that classification and
phylogenetic placement of very early "primate" fossils are debated
among
paleoanthropologists. Some researchers recognize Purgatorius
sp.
and other Plesiadapiforms as pre-primates or proto-primates
(transitional
forms), while other researchers consider them to be non-primate but
closely
related mammals (probably insectivores). It is widely accepted,
however, that the earliest
primates evolved from an insectivore ancestor.
ASSIGNMENT
Answers to all questions will be neatly written in pencil on the answer sheets provided in lab. Exercises that do not require examination of skeletal specimens may be completed outside of class time.
A. What is your reaction to the "Missing Links"
handout provided in class, especially Figures 10.17 and 10.18? What are
the implications for the study of paleoanthropology?
C. Complete Exercise 8.1
in the France lab manual, excluding questions 1 through 4. For
questions 5, 7 and 8, list at least two traits. For question 10, list
at least one trait.
For question 11, list at least two similarities and two
differences.
For question 12, list at least four similarities. For question
13,
list at least three skeletal parts. In addition to the text, use the
following figures to answer the questions:
Question |
Figures |
5 |
4.9, 4.10 |
7 |
7.5, 7.6,
5.13, 5.14, 5.15, 5.17 |
8 |
8.4, 8.5,
5.14, 5.16, 5.17 |
9 |
8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 7.6 |
10 |
8.3, 8.4, 8.5 |
11 |
8.3,
8.4, 8.5, 8.7 |
12 |
8.8, 4.11 |
REFERENCES
Lewin, Roger and Robert Foley
2004 Principles
of Human Evolution (2nd edition). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
France, Diane
2004 Lab Manual and Workbook for Physical Anthropology (5th
edition).
Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.