wku logo
Anth 300 Forensic Anthropology
Dr. Darlene Applegate
Spring 2008
LAB 8:  TAPHONOMY EVALUATION
WARNING: this web page contains photographs of human skeletal remains

INTRODUCTION

The analytical stage of forensic anthropology involves answering questions that lead to identification of the individual whose remains are being examined.  The questions asked in developing a biological or demographic profile for an individual include the following:

In this lab we will investigate an important issue - taphonomy - that does not relate directly to developing a biological profile but, nonetheless, must be considered when analyzing and interpreting human skeletal remains. What taphonomic processes affected the skeletal remains and in what ways?  It is critical that the effects of taphonomic processes on bone are not confused with biological indicators or the effects of traumas and pathologies on bone.

 
OBJECTIVES


READINGS


TERMS

 
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS  
TAPHONOMIC PROCESSES

Taphonomy is the study of the fossilization process or the biological or geological processes that affect the condition, preservation or location of skeletal remains after an individual dies.  By definition, taphonomic processes are postmortem, meaning they affect the hard tissues after
death.  The effects of taphonomic processes on bones must be distinguished from skeletal attributes used in developing a biological profile.


BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES

Biological taphonomic processes are related to plant and animal activity and include rodent gnawing, carnivore gnawing, carnivore digestion, algal growth and root etching.

Rodent gnawing leaves paired, U-shaped parallel incisions on bones.  Rodents typically gnaw on the projections of bones (crests, tuberosities, condyles, processes, etc.), but the incisions also occur on low-relief surfaces of bones.  The fact that rodent gnawing marks are paired distinguishes them from carnivore gnawing, and the fact that rodent gnawing marks follow the contour of a bone distinguishes them from cut-marks or incised sharp-force traumas.

gnawing photo


When rodents gnaw in opposite directions on a bone surface, they may create what appears to be a ridge or crest, as pictured in the upper left of the bone below.

rodent gnawing


Carnivore gnawing
leaves single, U-shaped incisions or "channels" on bones that should not be confused with incised sharp-force traumas.  Carnivores also leave small round depressed fractures where their canine teeth puncture the cortical bone.  In addition, they gnaw the ends of bones and bone projections, exposing spongy bone; carnivores crush bone shafts in order to extract marrow, creating "spiral" fractures.  Note the punctures on the bone below.

carnivore gnawing


Carnivore digestion
results in pitting and dissolution of bone, which often exposes spongy bone.  A bone that is pitted by carnivore digestion is shown below.  This taphonomic alteration should not be confused with periosteal reactions.

carnivore digestion


Algal growth
is evidenced by the accumulation of discontinuous green spots or continuous green areas on bone surfaces.  Algae grows on bones in moist, warm environments.  It should not be confused with copper staining from buttons or other evidence.  The arrow on the rib fragment below points to green algal growth.

algae


The weak acids released by plants through their roots can leave root etching marks on bone surfaces.  The etching is typically into the cortical bone and forms a dendritic pattern. The etching actually creates subsurface linear patterns on the bone surfaces, though in the photo below of an etched sheep mandible it appears that the alteration is deposited on top of the bone surface.


root etch
http://hoopermuseum.earthsci.carleton.ca/taphonomy/BONMOD4.HTM


GEOLOGICAL PROCESSES

Geological taphonomic processes relate to erosional and weathering agents and include element/mineral deposition, water erosion, wet-dry or freeze-thaw cycling, sun exposure, and burning.

Elements and minerals may be deposited on bone surfaces as a result of precipitation of those materials from groundwater contact.  Common deposits include manganese, calcite or calcium carbonate, and iron or iron oxides.

Manganese deposition is characterized by discontinuous, amorphous patches of dull black material on bone surfaces.  It should not be confused by carbonization from burning, which is usually more glossy or reflective.

manganese


Calcite (calcium carbonate) deposition
is characterized by discontinuous or continuous, amorphous patches of grayish, brittle, flaky material on bone surfaces.  It should not be confused with arthritic osteophyte development or dental calculus.

calcium

calcium


Iron and iron oxide deposition
is characterized by discontinuous, amorphous, rust-colored or blackened areas or spots on bone surfaces.  It should not be confused with carbonization from burning.

iron


Water erosion
results in rounding and smoothing of bone edges and projections as well as cortical bone loss.

Repeated cycles of wet-dry or freeze-thaw conditions cause exfoliation or delamination, or the loss of cortical bone as well as the development of longitudinal fractures, which are breaks oriented parallel to bone shafts or surfaces.  The images below represent exfoliation and longitudinal fracturing.

exfoliation

long fracture


Exposure to the sun causes bones to become bleached or whitened, such as the cow skull below.

bleach
http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/187260/2/Where_s_the_Beef_.jpg


Natural fires can alter bones in the same ways as vehicular or residential fires.  Bones initially become fractured and blackened or carbonized (as shown below on animal bone).  As the burning progresses, bones become increasingly fragmented, fractured and whitened or calcined.

burning
 

ASSIGNMENT

Using the above descriptions and comparative materials in the lab, examine each of the real bone specimens.  For each specimen, identify the skeletal element and side (for paired bones).  Identify the taphonomic agent(s) that affected the bones and, if asked, describe the effects (e.g., type of bone alteration, location of alteration, extent of alteration) of each agent.
 

REFERENCE

White, T. D. (1991) Human Osteology. Academic Press, San Diego.

Unless otherwise noted, all photographs are by Darlene Applegate.


Return to Forensic Anthropology Home Page
Visit the Western Kentucky University Home Page, Western Online
Page composed by Darlene Applegate, darlene.applegate@wku.edu
Last updated on March 3, 2008
All contents copyright (c), 2008. Western Kentucky University.