|
|||||
|
|||||
In the opinion of the Director of Accounting Research, these two studies comply with the instructions to the Accounting Research Division to make a study of the basic postulates and broad principles of accounting. Prior to its publication, Study No. 3 has been read and commented upon by a limited number of people in the field of accounting. Their reaction range from endorsement of the ideas set forth in the study of "Broad Principles: to misgivings that compliance with the recommendations set forth by the authors would lead to misleading financial statements. The Board is therefore treating these two studies as conscientious attempts by the accounting research staff to resolve major accounting issues which, however, contain inferences and recommendations in part of a speculative nature. The Board feels that there is ample room for improvement in present generally accepted accounting principles and a need to narrow or eliminate areas of difference which now exist. It hopes the studies will stimulate constructive comment and discussion in the areas of the basic postulates and broad principles and practices of accounting. Accounting principles and practices should be adapted to meet changing conditions, and therefore, there should be experimentation with new principles and new forms of reporting to meet these conditions. The Board believes, however, that while these studies are a valuable contribution to accounting thinking, they are too radically different from present generally accepted accounting principles for acceptance at this time. After a period of exposure and consideration, some of the specific recommendations in these studies may prove acceptable to the Board while others may not. The Board therefore will await the results of this exposure and consideration before taking further action on these studies.. From
APB
Statement
No.
1)
|
|||||
|
|
APB Statement No.
4,
"Basic Concepts
and Accounting Principles Underlying Financial Statements
of Business
Enterprises",
1970
This statement was developed as a result of the dissatisfaction with the earlier attempts at establishing a theoretical framework. Major portions of APB Statement No. 4 have been included in the FASB's Conceptual Framework project. Criticized because the document is more descriptive than prescriptive in nature. Hendriksen states that Statement No. 4 is an important document, but "is not a theory of accounting practice nor a clear statement of generally accepted accounting principles." |
Fourth and most recent attempt--1976 to current |
Financial
Accounting
Standards
Board
Discussion Memorandum: Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting and Reporting: Elements of Financial Statements and Their Measurement, 1976 Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, Numbers 1-7 1978--2000
|